I was writing a post article about videos made by a person on YouTube talking about the Book of Abraham and Joseph Smith. In the video, the man who is narrating it, says that the book is a fake and Joseph is also a fake. He says that Joseph Smith was mostly tricking people into believing that he was a prophet. Each video offers what he says is evidence to prove he was a liar and misled people into believing in things that were not true. (Sort of like the Vatican over the last 15 centuries, give or take.) Although it is true that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Salt Lake City was exterminated by the government, the British government, the Vatican, for a reason. Afterwards, it was set up as a fake church ran in secret by the government. The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints was the real church. That congregation went on after the Mormons were wiped out by the treasure hunters and the government agents under President Buchanan. The true story has been kept secret. What the, government run, secret church leaders said about Joseph Smith after he died doesn't matter. - you can't trust that information from the fake church. False testimony and faking evidence as well as slander and premeditated lies by the government is always a constant when dealing with our government. But just to say a little on the subject of the book of Abraham..... I did want to say that the parchment (let me get a picture of it).... piece is from the original parchments that Joseph Smith claimed to translate into the Book of Abraham. That is what Smith called it.
This picture represents the style of writings found on the benches inside the cave where the treasure of Solomon was found.
From Cairo University in Egypt the British intelligence office took control of the artifacts and the treasure.
I knew the mixed language was real.
Now the question is whether the language had characteristics from both languages that may have been altered from the original pictures or text.?
Knowing that there was such a language gives Prophet Smith more credibility in what he claimed about translating the parchments. If you care to study the matter.
The mixed language was written all over the benches. It was plain to see. The work was beautiful.
The benches were about 24 feet long. That would be my best guess.
The text and hieroglyphics were carved into the wood.
The wood was apparently solid teak. The benches were carved out of the sold timbers.
Text from Hebrew language and Egyptian hieroglyphics covered the benches.
The pictures closely resemble the actual shape and positions of the benches in the cave.
Knowing what the Egyptian hieroglyphics were and seeing the text from the Hebrew language,
it was simple to see that there was a difference between the two written languages but they were used
together to form one language.
I wanted to state that the picture I saw on the bench seat resembled the parchment as it was concerning a funeral or embalming. I always thought the picture looked like the one on the bench but with Hebrew text. Here's a pic of it.
The evidence of the mixed language suggests that a language, part Egyptian, part Hebrew text
was formed into one language used after the Exodus.
The benches were in the cave left undisturbed for thousands of years along with
the vast treasure thought of as the treasure of Solomon.
The cave was possibly a burial chamber resembling a tomb like King Tuts in Egypt, where
the leaders were buried with treasure.
Artifacts mentioned in the bible were also found such as the jeweled harps.
On the side of the cave wall before the benches was a curtain....
Between the curtain on the wall was written one word. Apparently in Hebrew.
The text meaning is not known by me.